Take Control of Your Online Privacy

Take Control of Your Online Privacy cover

It seems like every few days I run across yet another news story about a privacy catastrophe of one kind or another. Maybe it’s a huge corporation that suffered some sort of data breach, revealing private data about millions of customers. Or slimy behavior by social media companies like Facebook and Twitter. Or the latest creepy attempts by advertisers to track people’s movements across the web without their permission. Or any of countless other examples of how using the internet puts your personal information—and perhaps even your physical safety—at risk.

Online privacy is a hot mess these days, and with few exceptions, the big tech companies are working against greater privacy protections, not for it. It’s enough to drive even tech experts (to say nothing of the rest of us) to despair. That’s why I wrote Take Control of Your Online Privacy—I felt the world needed an easy-to-read summary of what the threats are and how ordinary people can achieve a reasonable level of privacy online without abandoning all technology and heading off to live in a cave somewhere. This book tackles web browsing, email, digital payments, social media, file sharing, and numerous other types of online activity, showing users of any platform what they can do to protect their private data. The brand-new fourth edition, released last week, brings the book fully up to date with all the latest techniques, hardware, and software you can use to keep your personal data private. I hope you’ll find it helpful!

This book, like all Take Control titles, comes as an ebook, and you can download any combination of formats—PDF, EPUB, and/or Kindle’s Mobipocket format—so you can read it on pretty much any computer, smartphone, tablet, or ebook reader. The cover price is $14.99, but as an Interesting Thing of the Day reader, you can buy it this week for 30% off, or just $10.49.


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

Mate

Mate in a traditional gourd with a bombilla

The national beverage of Argentina

I’m a coffee person. I wouldn’t say I’m addicted to it, but I do certainly enjoy drinking it on a more or less daily basis. Sometimes two or three times a day. In fact, now that I think about it, I could use a cup right now. Excuse me. (Time passes.) Ah, that’s better. I do not drink coffee for my health, although I am aware of studies suggesting that coffee consumption in moderation may reduce the risk of colon cancer, kidney stones, heart disease, and even Parkinson’s Disease. But I certainly appreciate the caffeine, the aroma, and the soothing effect of a warm beverage sliding across my tongue and down my esophagus.

Many of my friends, however, are tea people. I have nothing against a nice cup of tea now and then, and of course tea ably fills that hot beverage need. But in terms of aroma and both psychological and physiological impact, tea just doesn’t do it for me. Once again, tea’s supposed health benefits—of which there are, I admit, far more than those of coffee—don’t quite tip the scales. Maybe I’d be 5% healthier if I switched from coffee to tea, but then, maybe I’d also be 10% grouchier.

A Drink to Die For

I am always, however, happy to try new and unusual hot beverages, especially if they are reputed to have health benefits, a strong aroma, and a flavor frequently referred to as an “acquired taste.” And even more so if the beverage must be prepared and served in a highly ritualized way using special, single-purpose gadgets. So on a trip to Argentina in 2004, I was enthusiastic about sampling mate, their national beverage—and acquiring the necessary paraphernalia to make it myself.

Now, keep in mind: back then, mate wasn’t really a thing in the United States. This was long before every supermarket, convenience store, and cafe in North America hopped on the yerba mate bandwagon, with all manner of hot and cold drinks based on this plant. But even if you’ve sampled something called mate, if you didn’t do it in Argentina, I’ll bet you didn’t do it the “right” way (as defined by Argentineans).

According to one survey, mate (pronounced “MAH-teh”—and not to be confused with the Spanish word maté, which means “I killed”) is regularly consumed by some 92% of Argentineans—and by similarly large numbers of people in Uruguay, Paraguay, and Brazil. Superficially it appears to be a kind of tea, but appearances are deceiving. The true story is much more complex.

For starters, there’s the nomenclature. The dried leaves that are brewed to make mate are known as yerba mate—the word yerba meaning “herb.” This is, however, a misnomer: the leaves come from an evergreen tree in the holly family, Ilex paraguariensis. The word mate itself comes from the Quechua word matí, which refers to a certain type of gourd (Lagenaria vulgaris) which, when dried and hollowed, is used as the serving vessel for the beverage. So depending on context, mate can mean the leaves, the container, or the infusion of the leaves in water. The latter sense appears to be the most common—and is thus at odds with the typical North American usage of “yerba mate” to refer to that infusion.

Details, Details, Details

Yerba mate plants must be carefully cultivated and their leaves harvested at just the right time. The leaves are briefly roasted to preserve their color and prevent spoilage, then dried thoroughly, coarsely ground, and left to age for nine months. Finally, they are crushed and packaged. One supermarket we visited in Patagonia had an entire aisle of mate—dozens of varieties, textures, blends, and package sizes. But even the highest-quality brands were inexpensive: a few dollars or so for a kilogram.

The gourds come in every conceivable shape, size, and color, usually with a three-legged metal base (to prevent tipping, since the bottom is convex), and often with a metal ring around the hole in the top, to reduce wear. Although actual gourds are most common, we also saw mate pots made out of clay, ceramic, metal, and even cows’ hooves and horns. Each gourd also requires a special accessory called a bombilla—basically a metal straw with a strainer at the bottom. Instead of filtering out the tiny leaf fragments when the beverage is brewed, drinkers use the bombilla to filter it as they sip.

To prepare mate, one must begin with a properly “cured” gourd—one that has been soaked or cleaned in one of several ways to remove the residual oils that could adversely affect the flavor. The gourd is then filled about two-thirds full of yerba mate leaves, shaken, and tipped at an angle. A small amount of hot water is poured into the empty side, and after a couple of minutes, the bombilla is inserted and a larger quantity of hot water added. Each of the numerous books and websites I read that described mate preparation had different instructions for the precise method of creating an ideal mate—and in fact, many people prefer to leave this immensely important and challenging task to a cebador, a local expert in mate preparation. Every source I consulted, however, was in agreement that unlike tea, mate must never be made with boiling water.

Mate has the somewhat bitter taste of tannins, much like tea. Because of the ratio of leaves to water, it is a very strong flavor. Some of my companions likened it to “grass,” “hay,” or “alfalfa.” I believe these descriptions were intended to be uncomplimentary. I felt about the taste the way I felt about coffee the first time: kind of bitter, not immediately appealing, but I’ll bet it could grow on me.

Drink Me

Mate is normally shared among several people. I read in two different books that each person customarily takes a sip or two from the bombilla, passes the mate to the next person, and the cycle continues. When the liquid gets low, more hot water is added. However, a reader from Buenos Aires informed me that the custom as he knows it is for each person to finish the amount of water in the gourd and pass it back to the cebador, who then refills it and passes it to the next person.

In any case, because such a large quantity of leaves is used, it takes a long time for a single dose of mate to lose its flavor. The people we observed drinking mate appeared to be unconcerned about sharing germs. Apparently in some situations individual, disposable bombillas are used—but more for convenience than hygiene. Our guide did tell us, though, that according to legend when companions share a mate, they will also share their dreams. I did not check to see what other members of our group dreamed about the night after we shared our first mate, but it makes a nice story in any case.

Purists drink their mate hot and unsweetened—just the way I like my coffee. But I read repeatedly that some segments of the population, such as women, children, and city dwellers (if you can believe such categories) prefer their mate cold and/or sweetened with sugar—and sometimes even prepared with milk. We observed locals drinking mate at all hours—in fact, pretty much constantly throughout the day—except with meals. The quantity typically ingested in a day puts my considerable coffee consumption to shame. In order to be assured of a ready supply of raw materials, some people carry around leather cases large enough to hold a gourd, a thermos full of hot water, and a large bag of yerba mate.

Mate is a mild stimulant—when brewed, it has about half as much caffeine as coffee. Some people believe that unlike coffee, mate’s stimulant effect disappears very quickly when you stop drinking, so it can be consumed safely at bedtime. Mate supposedly functions as a digestive aid, which seems reasonable enough; it’s also used as a laxative. Other health claims abound: mate is said to curb the appetite, boost immunity, combat the effects of aging, and even return gray hair to its original shade—among many other benefits. How many of these effects are genuine, I can’t say. But I suspect its health benefits handily beat those of coffee.

Argentineans who drink mate all day long take it very seriously—they must have just the right brand, prepared just the right way in just the right gourd. And of course, “just right” differs enormously from person to person. In this respect, the mate phenomenon is very much like the culture of coffee snobs in the United States. I did bring home my own mate kit, and in fact my gourd is pictured above. (Needless to say, all the supplies to make your own mate are readily available online.) Whether I ever trade my coffee fanaticism for mate remains to be seen, but if I suddenly seem younger and healthier, you’ll know why.

Note: This is an updated version of an article that originally appeared on Interesting Thing of the Day on January 29, 2005.


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

Geocaching

A geocache

Adventures with GPS and hiking boots

Hark back with me to a time, long ago, when human beings outnumbered GPS receivers. I know, it’s weird to think about, right? But at this moment I have a GPS receiver built into my smartphone and another built into my smartwatch, and at a rough tally, the total number of such devices in my house right now is eight. Once a specialized, expensive gadget for outdoorsy types with plenty of disposable income, they’re now so common we barely think about them. Every time you ask your car or your phone for directions, you just assume that its GPS circuitry will know where you are and be able to tell you how to get exactly where you want to go.

But back in 2003, when even someone with as much of an interest in gadgets as me couldn’t come up with a good reason to buy a GPS receiver, I was tickled to read an article about a new activity just for those relatively few people with the right hardware. Combining recreation, exercise, high-tech gizmos, and a bit of detective work, geocaching was, at the time, the latest geek rage.

I’m In It for the Cache

Geocaching became possible in 2000, when the U.S. government eliminated a policy called Selective Availability that artificially reduced the accuracy of GPS measurements by non-military folk to a radius of about 100 meters. Once much more precision was possible for civilians, interesting new applications emerged, one of which was a modern version of a treasure hunt. The idea behind geocaching is extremely simple: hide some stuff (the cache), take note of its coordinates using your GPS receiver, publish those coordinates on the web, and invite other people to come find it (using their own GPS equipment as a guide). Nowadays it’s even simpler, as you can just download a smartphone app that’ll display details about all nearby caches on an interactive map.

The cache is usually a watertight container holding a logbook (for finders to record their names and when they located it) and any other random trinkets the owner wishes to include. Usually a cache contains nothing of tangible value; the reward is in the discovery itself, though you might get a small souvenir for your efforts. Finders often leave a memento of their own for the next geocacher who comes upon that site; in more advanced versions of the sport, a cache might contain clues that lead to yet another cache, or an object that’s intended to be relocated to the next cache the person discovers.

Hide and Seek

If your smartphone or any other GPS receiver can indicate your exact position, it may seem as though there’s not much sport—just walk to those coordinates, pick up the box, and you’re done, right? But it’s quite a bit more involved than that. For one thing, GPS receivers still have some margin of error—you may need to search an area with a radius of up to 10 meters. For another, geocaching coordinates generally do not include altitude. A cache could be hidden on the side of a mountain, underwater, in a tree, under a rock, or somewhere inside a public building, all of which would make for a very interesting search. More importantly, knowing where something is doesn’t imply you know how to get to it; the most creative and challenging cache locations are those that require considerable planning, skill, and physical effort to reach.

Geocaching went from a clever idea to an international craze within just a few years. Now, although the newness and exclusivity have worn off, there are approximately eleventy bazillion caches hidden around the world, including dozens within walking distance of my house. There are caches I’ve walked by for years, and would never have known about were it not for the fact that they show up in an app on my phone. And that’s what I find so nifty about geocaching: it’s a way to discover another dimension of your own neighborhood, as you find treasures hidden (almost) in plain sight.

Note: This is an updated version of an article that originally appeared on Interesting Thing of the Day on September 13, 2003, and again in a slightly revised form on January 11, 2005.

Image credit: Pixabay


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

My Recent Frugal and Extremely Frugal Accomplishments

Hi there everyone! I am so excited to share this post with you, about some frugal and extremely frugal things I did lately! I used to do this on a regular basis, and then my life got super busy and it felt like I didn’t even have time to breathe, let alone do anything particularly frugal… But fortunately I’ve managed to breathe a little again, and because of that, I’ve managed to do these


Go to Source
Author: Penniless Parenting

Where An Acupuncture Career Can Lead You

Frugal living is great and all, but sometimes you need to increase your income so you have more leeway in the budget, instead of just lowering your expenses again and again. To raise your income, some people decide to learn a trade, and studying acupuncture is one of them. Here’s an infographic from a reader that shows you possible career options that open up to you if you study acupuncture.


Go to Source
Author: Penniless Parenting

No fault divorce, at last

What a week it has been in family law as the government finally announced its plans for reform to the current divorce law in England and Wales.

Welcomed by us all at Stowe, the reform will see the introduction of “no-fault” divorce and the removal of the need to allocate blame on one party.

Mark Christie from our Harrogate office, has over 35 years family law experience with a focus on divorce, separation and private law children disputes. He joins us today to share his views on the reform of our current “somewhat archaic grounds for divorce.”

This week, the government, after much lobbying from Resolution-First for Family Law, the organisation representing specialist family lawyers for a reform of the somewhat archaic grounds for divorce, announced that it will legislate to reform the grounds for divorce.

The current law necessitates a couple who wish to have a divorce, relying upon one of five separate facts, three of which are fault-based, i.e. adultery, behaviour (often colloquially referred to as unreasonable behaviour) and two years desertion.

In this new announcement, which has been long awaited and which will see the biggest reform in our divorce laws for 50 years, it is proposed that the law will be changed to remove the fault-based facts and for the parties to simply provide a statement to the effect that the marriage has broken down irretrievably.

It is also proposed that the ability to defend a divorce will be removed and that couples can jointly apply to the Court for a divorce.

Once such legislation is passed, it is hoped that couples will be able to obtain a divorce in a much less hostile environment without having to blame each other, and which currently causes unnecessary emotional turmoil to not only the couple divorcing but also to any children of the marriage.

Once it is possible to obtain a divorce without having to blame each other, couples will be able to bring their marriage to an end in a much more amicable manner, which will enhance the prospect of them retaining a reasonable relationship with each other, and so enable them to better co-parent their children and agree on a financial settlement.

Of course, there will be the usual traditionalist criticism of such a move, arguing that making divorce easier undermines the institute of marriage.

The reality, however, is that the proposed legislation will not make the obtaining of divorce any easier but will just remove the “blame game” from the process to the benefit of all parties and any children concerned.

It may be that once the changes come into effect, there will be an initial spike in the divorce rate, but this will only be short lived.

It is to be hoped that the legislation will come into force as quickly as possible, though, considering the current Brexit situation, it is anyone’s guess as to when there will be sufficient parliamentary time available to pass the requisite legislation.

 

The post No fault divorce, at last appeared first on Stowe Family Law.


Go to Source
Author: Mark Christie

Stowe comment: Arbitration v Court

As the Ministry of Justice releases family court statistics that show a 3% increase in new cases and an average 3-week increase in the time to reach a final order (2017 v 2018), it is clear that the courts are struggling to cope with demand.

To relieve some of this pressure, other alternative methods to reaching a resolve in family court matters must be more widely considered.

Faster and more flexible, family arbitration is one of the approaches that could help you and your ex-partner to make final and legally binding decisions whilst avoiding the over-stretched courts.

So how does arbitration work and what are the benefits? We asked Angela Sussens, Partner at our Leeds office to join us on the blog to explain further.

Arbitration is a form of dispute resolution and involves a third party (the arbitrator) adopting the role of Judge. The arbitrator will decide on the issues they are appointed to deal with after reviewing and hearing evidence from both parties in the same way that a Judge would at a final hearing.

When conducting an arbitration, arbitrators are required to apply the law of England and Wales. The arbitrator’s final decision is binding on both parties and is known as an Award (financial matters) or a Determination (children matters). The decision can then be embodied into a Court Order and submitted to Court for approval by a Judge.

To proceed with arbitration, both parties must agree that they are willing to proceed in this way. They are required to sign a document which sets out the rules of arbitration and by signing the document, the parties agree to be bound by the arbitrator’s final decision.

Neither party can subsequently decide that they do not want to arbitrate unless the other party also agrees to terminate the process. Once the arbitrator has accepted the appointment, the arbitration process formally begins. If there are Court proceedings, those proceedings will be put on hold to await the outcome of the arbitration.

The parties can jointly appoint an arbitrator or alternatively, they can elect for the Institute of Family Law Arbitrators (IFLA) to select one for them. There are separate panels for arbitrators who deal with finance or children matters but some arbitrators are members of both panels. Details of trained and accredited arbitrators can be found on the IFLA website. Those listed are experienced family law practitioners who have also completed the family arbitration training course.

How can an arbitrator help you?

Arbitrators can deal with most financial and property disputes arising from family/relationship breakdowns in the same way that a Judge can. Arbitrators are not however able to deal with financial matters where there is an issue over jurisdiction or cases involving the recognition of a foreign marriage or divorce.

Arbitrators can deal with many matters relating to children where the parties have parental responsibility including, but not limited to, where a child is to live, contact arrangements and decisions over education.

Usually, although not always, there will be an initial meeting between the arbitrator and the parties to agree on the steps needed to get the case ready. The arbitrator has the power to make case management and interim decisions such as deciding what evidence is to be provided and whether there is a need for expert evidence.

The arbitrator also has the power to make an order for one party to make maintenance payments to the other pending the outcome of the arbitration if the interim financial arrangements are not agreed.

After the final arbitration meeting, the arbitrator will issue an Award or Determination setting out their decision which is the equivalent of a final judgment and is binding on the parties. The parties are then required to apply to the court for an order replicating the Award or Determination. Only in very rare cases will an Award or Determination not be upheld.  The recent decision of Ambrose J in the case of BC v BG [2019] EWFC 7 reaffirmed this point

 ‘Any application to resile from an arbitration award should be unusual. Applications using the “notice to show cause” procedure or an application for no order to be made (as adopted in this case) should be exceptional for the reasons given in S v S and DB v DLJ’.

What are the benefits?

There are many benefits of arbitration when compared to the traditional court process.

Take less time

Firstly, arbitration is an opportunity to expedite the case and avoid lengthy court delays. It often takes the Court several weeks to issue an application and then a further delay is encountered when listing the matter for hearings. The parties and the arbitrator have total control over the timetable. There is also less risk of a hearing being adjourned or cancelled due to a judge becoming unavailable which happens increasingly often in court proceedings.

More cost-effective

Another benefit is that the arbitration process is often more cost-effective than the Court process although parties are required to meet the arbitrator’s fees which will vary from case to case.

The parties can also elect for arbitration to be completed on paper, if appropriate, which may further reduce costs.

Confidentiality

Confidentiality is also a benefit and arbitration is protected by strict confidentiality rules.

Greater control of the case

Arbitration provides the parties with greater control and flexibility over how the case is managed. The parties can define the scope of their arbitration and if there are specific issues in dispute, while other issues are agreed, the parties can limit arbitration to the issues in dispute.

The parties also decide when and where the hearings are to take place, albeit subject to the arbitrator’s availability. One of the main benefits of arbitration is the ability to appoint an experienced family law practitioner who will deal with the case from start to finish. There are a number of highly regarded family lawyers who are trained as arbitrators, thus giving the parties complete confidence that their dispute will be resolved by someone with the appropriate experience.

Arbitration in action

I was recently involved in an arbitration case dealing with the financial arrangements following the breakdown of the parties’ marriage. In that case, the parties agreed to use arbitration to resolve the issues in dispute between them. The arbitration process was concluded within c.16 weeks. It could easily have taken a year to reach a final hearing within the court process.

The final arbitration ‘hearing’ was dealt with in one day but is likely to have required two days in Court. Costs were contained after we were able to agree on the case management directions with the opposing party and the arbitrator thereby avoiding the need for an interim meeting or telephone appointment. The total costs were considerably less than they would otherwise have been if the matter was dealt with in the standard court process.

While arbitration provides a reliable and comprehensive alternative to the court process, it still involves handing over the final decision to a third party which is not ideal. If there is any scope for the parties to reach an agreement over the issues in dispute through negotiation, this will always be preferable to passing control to someone else.

Get in touch

If you would like some advice on arbitration and how it could help you please do contact me at [email protected]

Details of all of our arbitrators and the work they do can be found here.

The post Stowe comment: Arbitration v Court appeared first on Stowe Family Law.


Go to Source
Author: Angela Sussens

A week in family law: Cafcass figures, family justice changes, no-fault divorce, and more

And quite a week it has been too.

Firstly, the trends in new public and private law children cases is continuing, with the former decreasing, and the latter increasing. Cafcass has reported that in March it received 1,117 new care applications. This is 9.9 per cent (123 applications) lower than March 2018. In the last twelve months Cafcass received 13,536 new care applications; this is a fall of 4.8 per cent (685 applications) from the previous twelve months. As to private law demand, Cafcass received 4,166 new cases during March 2019. This is 18.2 per cent (640 cases) higher than March 2018 and the highest March on record. Cafcass has experienced a steep increase in demand in the last two months. The previous month Cafcass saw the highest level of demand in February since 2013. Prior to that new private law cases had been 3.8 per cent higher than the same period previous year.

As I reported here, Mr Justice Mostyn has held that no weight should be given to a pre-nuptial agreement, in a divorce involving the great-granddaughter of the founder of Avon cosmetics. The parties entered into the agreement when they married in 2005. The marriage broke down in 2016. The husband subsequently issued a financial remedies application within divorce proceedings. The wife is the beneficiary of family trusts in the USA, with an overall value of at least $65 million, and the husband earns about £35,000 gross, with no net capital. Hearing the application, Mr Justice Mostyn held that it would be wholly unfair to hold the husband to the agreement, which would have left him with nothing. Instead, he awarded the husband a lump sum of £1,333,500, of which £375,000 was subject to a charge-back to the wife (or her estate), on the death of the husband. A reminder that our courts are not bound by pre-nuptial agreements, and will not uphold them if they think they are unfair.

As I also reported here, the President of the Family Division Sir Andrew McFarlane has provided an update on the changes currently happening in the family justice system, in a keynote address to the annual conference of Resolution, the association of family lawyers. I say ‘currently’, as it seems to me that there are always changes happening these days. Perhaps the biggest headline from his speech was when he informed his listeners that it will soon be possible to deal with all stages of the divorce process online. He said that the remaining parts of the divorce process, namely decree nisi and degree absolute, will be online “in the next few months.” Once the process is fully up and running, solicitors will be able to log on from anywhere, at any time, and see the state of an individual divorce case as it moves forward. They will also be able to file documents and communicate with the court and/or the other parties remotely through the system. By the end of 2019, he said, it is anticipated that the vast majority of divorce proceedings will be conducted online, or, if paper-based, will be scanned and converted to online. It sounds quite wonderful, but there is of course one problem with all of this: the whole system will have to be completely re-done if and when we get no-fault divorce.

Which brings me to my last story, and the biggest family law news of the week, which of course relates to divorce reform. Although whether we can actually call it ‘news’, I’m not so sure. Early on Tuesday the story broke that the Justice Secretary, David Gauke, had pledged that legislation for no-fault divorce will be introduced as soon as parliamentary time becomes available. This was not really news, as back in February it had been reported that Mr Gauke confirmed he would “bring in legislation enacting the reform in the next session of parliament”. A little later, however, there was something more concrete, when the Ministry of Justice published the Government’s response to the consultation on reform of the legal requirements for divorce. I haven’t studied the response, but it seems that the consultation has not changed the minds of those in government about the essential features of reform that they proposed in the original consultation document. Whatever, I suppose we must be grateful that we are hopefully going to get a system of no-fault divorce after all of these years, even if it may not be exactly what some of us had hoped for. I say ‘hopefully’, as there are still some hurdles for any legislation to get over. In particular, the Government does have the small matter of Brexit to deal with, which could derail any reform of divorce, for example if there is a general election. Let us just hope that the legislation stays on track.

Have a good weekend.

The post A week in family law: Cafcass figures, family justice changes, no-fault divorce, and more appeared first on Stowe Family Law.


Go to Source
Author: John Bolch

Fire Pistons

A fire piston in action

The primitive hi-tech fire starters

I’ve never been much of a camping enthusiast. It’s not that I don’t appreciate all the great gadgets associated with camping, and I certainly enjoy hiking, fresh air, and getting away from it all. But after toting all our high-tech apparatus into the middle of nowhere, setting up a tent, and rolling out the sleeping bags, I invariably think to myself: this is an awful lot of work for very little comfort. At home I would have had a nice squishy mattress, a flush toilet, clean water, and no mosquitoes. Why am I doing this again? Then it comes time to build a fire and I discover some cruel corollary of Murphy’s Law at work. On those rare days I ever have to attempt this task, it’s always windy, damp, or both. Of course, I know that when matches fail, I can always bring out some specially flammable substance designed expressly for the pyrotechnically challenged. But the latest rage in fire-starting equipment is actually centuries old and uses no chemicals, sparks, or even metal components. Meet the fire piston: a deceptively simple tool that uses compressed air to start a blaze in just seconds.

Light Me Up

A fire piston is a small cylindrical object usually made of wood, bone, or plastic. It consists of two main parts: an outer casing, which is hollow but closed on one end, and the piston itself—a rod or plunger that fits the hole in the casing perfectly and whose tip reaches almost, but not quite, to the stoppered end of the tube. The tip of the piston has a small indentation or hole, and just behind the tip is usually a gasket of some kind to ensure an airtight seal—perhaps a rubber O-ring or simply some waxed string. In other words, very basic parts that require little technological sophistication to create.

To use a fire piston, you put a tiny piece of tinder in the indentation at the tip of the piston, and perhaps apply a dab of grease to the gasket for lubrication. Then you place the plunger into the tube and smack it down rapidly. This compresses the air inside, which raises its temperature. Within less than a second, the temperature at the tip of the piston can reach more than 800°F (about 425°C)—enough to turn the tinder into a glowing ember. The pressure also, conveniently, works as a spring that forces the piston back out of the casing. Transfer the ember to a larger pile of tinder, blow for a few seconds, and poof! You’ve got fire.

Pressure Cooker

In an earlier version of this article, I made the rookie mistake of believing something I read on some random webpage, and then compounded the problem by repeating that claim. The claim was that fire pistons work according to a principle called Charles’s law, but that is not only wrong, it’s pretty much the opposite of right. (Charles’s law has to do with the relationship between a gas’s pressure and its temperature, as in rising temperatures make the gas expand.) I hereby repent of my faulty reporting.

In fact, what’s going on is an adiabatic heating process, in which the rapid compression of the air increases its temperature as the pressure increases, and the system doesn’t leave that heat anywhere else to go. You can approximate this effect by inflating a tire with a manual tire pump—yet another piston design—and notice that the pump gets hot as you use it (although that type of design does provide an outlet for most of the heat). This very principle is what makes diesel engines work: the fuel is ignited by rapidly compressed air, not by a spark as in conventional internal-combustion engines. In fact, some people believe Rudolf Diesel may have gotten the idea for his engine from seeing a fire piston being demonstrated.

No one knows who invented the first fire piston. Although the device was patented in England in the early 1800s, a similar design (albeit made from different materials) was apparently in use long before that in Indonesia, the Philippines, and several other southeast Asian nations. The prevailing theory is that in the process of hollowing out a long tube to make a blowgun, a hunter inadvertently ignited some sawdust.

In any case, just as fire pistons were beginning to catch on in Europe, matches hit the scene, and quickly took over as the most popular method of making a flame. And so fire pistons were all but forgotten—at least in the western world—for the better part of two centuries.

But under certain conditions, matches are still no match for a fire piston. Because fire pistons create a watertight seal, they’re virtually weatherproof. And because you’re working with a glowing ember rather than an open flame, wind can actually work in your favor. You do, of course, have to have dry material to burn, but that’s pretty much a given if you’re going to start a fire by any means.

I first heard about fire pistons in an email from one of the many readers who regularly supplement my list of interesting things to research. After browsing a few websites—and, especially, watching some videos of the devices in action—I was simply astonished. I couldn’t believe that something so simple, effective, and useful wasn’t part of every camper’s gear. It might have been, had matches not been invented at just the right (or wrong) time.

Note: This is an updated version of an article that originally appeared on Interesting Thing of the Day on April 3, 2005.

Image credit: Chocolateoak [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell