International Women’s Day

International Women's Day poster

International Women’s Day is a storied holiday, observed each year on March 8. It both celebrates women’s countless achievements and draws public attention to the continuing quest for equal rights, pay, and opportunities. It’s kind of shocking to me that even now, in 2019, we as a society haven’t figured out how to treat women with dignity and respect. Let’s see what we can do to fix that today.

Image credit: Public Domain Files


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

International Women’s Day: The rise of women in law

In honour of International Women’s Day, on the blog we look at the role of women in law and how the industry is changing to meet the needs of the modern lawyer, male or female.

Statistics released in June last year revealed that for the first time, the number of working solicitors in England and Wales has exceeded that of men – now 50.1% up from 43.4% in 2007. *

So, is the age of the male-dominated law industry over?

When Rachel Roberts, Managing Partner of the Stowe Family Law office in Leeds graduated she began her career with a strong, female mentor so believed that “anything seemed possible”. In fact, Rachel did not even consider her gender to “have an impact until I had children.”

Having children and finding balance is a struggle many women in law face and is reflected in the statistics when we look at seniority in the industry with women making up just 33% of partners in the UK (up from 31% in 2014). **

Times are changing 

But there are signs of change. A number of firms have signed up to The Law Society’s diversity and inclusion charter and the profession is becoming more flexible and fairer.

It’s a change that Stowe agrees with as we are committed to moving away from a traditional model to a model of flexibility and empowerment to help reduce pressure and strain.

“I am lucky to work for a firm that prioritises the well-being of its staff and I work flexible hours so that I can still do the school run 3 days a week and attend school events,” says Rachel. Currently, over 50% of the leadership team and Managing Partners work flexibly.

But it is not just about Managing Partners, “I am a great believer in trusting your team to manage their own diaries, workloads and work from home to allow them to meet their family commitments” she adds.

“For me, it is about putting boundaries in place, so I will work sometimes at home in the evening, but my weekends are precious, and my work phone is switched off or out of sight.”

Glass ceiling?

In 2017, Lady Justice Heather Hallett spoke of her hopes that there was no glass ceiling and that the law had changed considerably for the better for women. A sentiment that is reflected in the fact that 66% of all partners at Stowe and 70% of lawyers are female.

“Family law tends to attract more women, in fact, the team in Leeds is all-female and it’s really important that we find ways to work around family commitments so that we retain our talent,” continues Rachel.

“I have not encountered any obstacles to progressing up the career ladder because I am a woman, but I work at Stowe and we have a large number of women in senior roles. I am not sure how much flexibility there is in larger law firms.”

Her advice to women considering entering law now is simple “There is no limit to what you can achieve. The culture is changing, although in big firms it has a long way to go. So, get involved with organisations that care about retaining women in practice, and focus on well-being.”

“However, the whole sector now needs to change – men equally need to be able to have a healthy work-life balance and spend quality time with their friends and family.”

Rachel is Managing Partner of the Stowe Family Law Leeds office. She is also an ambassador for Women in the Law, a non-profit women’s networking organisation designed to encourage, inspire and support the next generation of lawyers and women in business.

*Law Society Annual Statistics Report 

**Solicitors Regulation Authority

The post International Women’s Day: The rise of women in law appeared first on Stowe Family Law.


Go to Source
Author: Rachel Roberts

Renting out your former home? You need to be aware of forthcoming tax changes.

All UK taxpayers have an annual exempt amount below which there is no liability to Capital Gains Tax (‘CGT’).

Any capital gain arising on the disposal of a residential property is currently subject to CGT at the rate of either 28% (higher rate taxpayers) or 18% (basic rate taxpayers).  

However, any gain made on disposal of an individual’s main residence which they have occupied as their main home throughout the entire period of ownership is wholly exempt from CGT through the use of Private Residence Relief (‘PRR’).  Reliefs are also currently available to those who have not occupied the property for the entire period of ownership.

On 29 October 2018 the Rt Hon Philip Hammond presented his 2018 Budget to Parliament and proposed changes to PRR, aiming to ensure it is more focused towards owner-occupiers.

It is proposed that the rules on two of the main ancillary reliefs currently available will change in April 2020 as follows:

Lettings relief

This relief is available to those individuals who let out a property that is, or has historically been, their main residence.  Relief of up £40,000 (£80,000 for couples) against the capital gain is currently available on the property, even if the owners have not occupied it for a long time.

However, this relief is to all extents and purposes disappearing, as from April 2020 it will only be available to those owners who occupy the property in shared occupancy with a tenant.  Thus, homeowners who move and let out their former home will be affected and may now wish to consider selling the property sooner rather than later to avoid an increased CGT bill.

The changes to this relief will not affect landlords who have never lived in the property they are renting out.

Final period exemption

This relief means that at present, the final 18 months of ownership is covered by PRR, even if the property is not the individual’s only or main residence during that period.  In other words, an individual currently has 18 months from the date of moving out before any gain begins to accrue.

From April 2020, this relief will be reduced to only 9 months, a period which HM Treasury considers to be twice the length of an average property transaction.  For disabled owners or those who live in residential care, the existing 36 month exemption period will remain in place.

Summary

Whether realistic or not, HM Treasury believes that delaying implementation of the above changes until April 2020 will give people sufficient time to rearrange their affairs (e.g. by selling their property) under the current rules should they chose to do so.

However, for those currently involved in divorce and finance proceedings, it is important that consideration is given to:

Possible CGT exposure, particularly where one party has moved out of a property (or intends to do so) and where it is also possible that the property will be sold.

Where appropriate, the impact of any property transfers which could take place during the course of proceedings, in order to mitigate any potential CGT liability.

The post Renting out your former home? You need to be aware of forthcoming tax changes. appeared first on Stowe Family Law.


Go to Source
Author: Suzanne Grant

Non-Newtonian Fluids

A non-Newtonian fluid

When liquids behave like solids

Like many people, I’ve tried hard to forget my days in junior high school. That was an unpleasant time in my life for all the usual reasons, and thankfully most of it is now a dim blur. But a few pleasant moments do stand out in my memory. One of those was a report I did for my ninth-grade science class. For reasons I no longer recall, the topic I chose was Pascal’s Law, and I must have prepared well for that 10-minute presentation, because I could probably stand up and give pretty much the same talk today, even though I never went on to study any more about it.

Pascal’s Law describes the behavior of fluids in a closed system, and says, to oversimplify somewhat, that the pressure the fluids exert is always the same throughout the system. This is the principle that enables hydraulic presses to work—a small amount of force applied to a piston pushing down on fluid can exert much more force on a larger connected piston, making it sort of like a liquid lever. The same effect has applications in everything from scuba diving to ventilation systems and dam construction.

Pascal, Meet Fisher

Although that little snippet of knowledge has stayed with me all this time, that marked the extent of what I knew about fluid mechanics until I wrote an article here about Space Pens. These pens, legendary for being able to write underwater, in zero gravity, in a vacuum, or in just about any other situation, use a special thixotropic ink, a substance that’s normally in a gel state but which turns into a liquid when it’s agitated—that is, when the ball rolls against it. It’s liquid just long enough to flow onto the paper, and then it turns semisolid again. (As spiffy as that is, some Space Pen ink turns out to have surprising problems, which you can read about in Space Pens vs. Purple Ink on my blog.)

Back in 2006, some very cool videos started making the rounds: people doing stunts with something called “non-Newtonian fluids.” If you’re not an engineer, that may not sound very intriguing, until you look at guys running across the surface of a vat filled with a solution of cornstarch and water, but sinking into it when they stand still. That’s a real eye-opener. (Mythbusters also did a segment on this phenomenon.) Or some other guys taking a handful of the same liquid goop and slapping it into solid balls, which then turn back into liquid as soon as the agitation stops. These are just a couple of the many wacky properties exhibited by non-Newtonian fluids—substances that change their viscosity in reaction to stress. (See YouTube for a long list of videos featuring non-Newtonian fluid experiments.) And sure enough, the ink from my Space Pen is in the same category.

Non-Newtonian fluids range from the exotic to the mundane. You’ve probably made a cornstarch-and-water mixture lots of times in your own kitchen, and if you made enough of it, you too could walk across its surface. Assuming the proportion of starch to water is right, the solution gets suddenly thick and firm when force is applied to it, as you may have noticed when trying to stir it when preparing a sauce. Stir more slowly, and it flows more easily.

Going with the Flow

But not all non-Newtonian fluids behave this way. Some of them get runnier when under stress, such as Space Pen ink and paints that adhere to a brush when at rest but glide on easily when the brush is applied to a surface. Also in the thixotropic category as well as in your kitchen: ketchup and honey.

There are still other varieties, too, which have different patterns of changing viscosity. Such varied substances as quicksand, Silly Putty, blood, dough, and gelatin fall under the broad non-Newtonian heading. By contrast, Newtonian fluids, or what most people think of as normal fluids, are those (like water) whose viscosity is determined only by temperature and pressure. Sure, water will get plenty firm if the temperature is reduced enough, but no amount of force can make liquid water behave like a solid.

The moral of the story? If you’re stuck in a non-Newtonian fluid—or junior high school—the trick is to remain calm. The more you struggle, the harder it gets.

Note: This is an updated version of an article that originally appeared on Interesting Thing of the Day on February 28, 2007.

Image credit: Rory MacLeod [CC BY 2.0], via Flickr


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

National Cereal Day

Cap'n Crunch cereal

Well, it’s National Cereal Day, where by “cereal” of course the implication is that you should go buy and eat some commercial, boxed breakfast cereal, probably sweetened and with a stupid cartoon character on the box. And, OK, I do enjoy a nice serving of Cap’n Crunch once every two or three years, but today, I think I’m going to rebel with some granola (still “cereal”) or, more likely, a hearty bowl of steel cut oats (also “cereal”). Maybe with some extra oat bran for good measure, because cereal.

Image credit: BrokenSphere [CC BY-SA 3.0], via Wikimedia Commons


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell

Tableware Taboos

A place setting at a table

Civilizing Mealtime

When I was growing up in a large family, my parents instilled in us certain table etiquette—if not for decorum’s sake, then at least to keep complete anarchy from breaking out while we broke bread. Commandments regarding posture (don’t slouch), arm position (no elbows on the table), and eating style (chew with your mouth closed) were familiar refrains around the supper table. I am thankful to my parents for these lessons, and now I teach my own children in a similar way. But after I left home, I found myself in certain dining situations where I did not know the rules, mostly because our family meals did not involve multi-course menus, where it was important to tell the oyster fork from the fish fork. (It was enough that we were not flinging forks across the table at each other.) In these situations, I could always tell myself that these were outdated conventions, and indeed these kinds of customs have mainly fallen by the wayside in our current low-tech food culture. But I always felt a lack, and a secret wish that I could conduct myself in the very highest echelons of society without embarrassment or awkwardness.

Pack The Knife

I therefore find it very interesting that Margaret Visser, in her book The Rituals of Dinner, asserts that it is precisely to forestall violence that such rules of etiquette came into being. She argues that “table manners are…a system of taboos designed to ensure that violence remains out of the question,” and that only later did they evolve into the complex, but mostly banal, rituals we know today. One of her primary examples of how the shared table can be a dangerous place, and why table manners are necessary, is the presence of sharp eating utensils at most meals. When everyone at the table is armed with knives, the most common eating implement in the West until recent times, there was always a possibility that mealtime fights would erupt into bloodshed. In fact, a few hundred years ago, it was the custom for each man to bring his own knife to a host’s table—the same knife he used for countless other purposes.

It may have been in response to the danger these knives posed that the French king banned pointed knives from the table in 1699, replacing them instead with the rounded knives still in common use. Even with such a precaution, it is now still correct etiquette for knives to be placed on the table with the blade facing the plate, and to be replaced in the same position after the meal. And even those of us who do not have a delicate grasp of the nuances of cutlery placement know that it is bad manners to point a knife at someone else or at oneself while sharing a meal.

The Knives Are Out

In contrast to the knife-centered history of the West, chopsticks have been the preferred eating utensils in Japan and China for thousands of years, possibly influenced by the teachings of Confucius, who believed that “The honorable and upright man…allows no knives on his table.” Knives are a symbol of violence or aggression, and therefore were contrary to Confucius’s nonviolent teachings. But even though chopsticks do not have the implied violence of knives, there are still certain taboos about how chopsticks may be used. In Japan there is an aversion to passing food via chopsticks from one person to another while eating together. This action recalls part of the Buddhist funeral ritual, in which family members use chopsticks to pick up bones from the crematory ashes, and pass them from person to person before they are placed in an urn. Also, it is not correct to leave chopsticks sticking upright in a bowl of rice, as this is reminiscent of a tribute to the dead (the deceased’s chopsticks stuck in a bowl of uncooked rice on the family altar).

I guess I always knew that more was at steak (sorry!) than politeness during our family dinner hour. We were keeping our violent tendencies at bay by keeping our knives to ourselves and resisting the temptation to leap out of our chairs at each other. We were, in fact, learning how to peacefully co-exist in a stressful situation (worrying about getting our fair share)—and were following the original intent of table etiquette, if not all of its arcane proscriptions.

Note: This is an updated version of an article that originally appeared on Interesting Thing of the Day on May 20, 2005.

Image credit: Pixabay


Go to Source
Author: Morgen Jahnke

National Dentist’s Day

Woman patient at dentist

Today is National Dentist’s Day. Or possibly National Dentists Day, or maybe even National Dentists’ Day. It’s unclear. In any case, it’s a day honoring dentists, and you can celebrate it, I suppose, by making an appointment for your twice-yearly checkup.

It can hardly be a coincidence that today is also National Oreo Cookie Day. I assume dentists love cookies and other sweets because, you know, more business. So chow down on your favorite chocolate sandwich cookie (namely, Newman-O’s) but be sure to brush and floss afterward!

Image credit: PxHere


Go to Source
Author: Joe Kissell